| re: Edgar Lansbury |
| Posted by: aleck 10:33 am EDT 06/19/24 |
| In reply to: re: Edgar Lansbury - Ann 10:25 am EDT 06/19/24 |
|
| I found the thread after I did a search. But that's not the point. The point is that the NYTimes did not think Lansbury's life was significant enough to run an obituary. How many other chat boards, covering all kinds of different topics, do I need to subscribe to and monitor to find out news -- of the passing of important people within each category as just on example of unreported events in, well, the "paper of record." |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Edgar Lansbury - Ann 10:25 am EDT 06/19/24 |
| Next: |
re: Edgar Lansbury - Ann 11:04 am EDT 06/19/24 |
| Thread: |
|
