| re: No Danielle Brooks? That’s a shame. (nm) |
| Posted by: tangledinblue 02:55 pm EDT 08/20/24 |
| In reply to: No Danielle Brooks? That’s a shame. (nm) - MockingbirdGirl 06:47 am EDT 08/20/24 |
|
I disagree. I found Brooks' performance on stage lacking depth and subtlety. I thought she was the weak link in the ensemble on stage.
After seeing Danielle Deadwyler's performance in the film "Till," I think she's ideal casting for the film and will bring the gravitas Brooks lacked. I predict Deadwyler will earn a Best Supporting Actress nomination this year at the Oscars (and maybe even win), awarding her performance as well as making up for the past snub of her performance in "Till." |
|
reply
|
|
| Previous: |
No Danielle Brooks? That’s a shame. (nm) - MockingbirdGirl 06:47 am EDT 08/20/24 |
| Next: |
re: No Danielle Brooks? That’s a shame. (nm) - champagnesalesman 10:37 am EDT 08/20/24 |
| Thread: |
|
